Reviewers should agree to evaluate articles related to their field of expertise.
Reviewers should refuse to evaluate the article that they think is a conflict of interest, and inform the Editorial Board.
Reviewers should make the evaluation objectively in order to contribute to the editor's decision-making process, provide guidance that will help to increase the quality of the article to be published, and carry out this process confidentially.
Reviewers should make their evaluations away from personal comments, in accordance with academic rules and with a constructive language.
Reviewers should convey their correction suggestions stated on the evaluation form and / or the text to the Editorial Board through the journal management system to be forwarded to the author (s).
Reviewers should evaluate the article within the given time.
The issues that the reviewers should pay attention while uploading the Reviewer Reports to the DergiPark system are as follows;
o The name of the reviewer should not appear in the detailed note you wrote to the editor or author.
o You should open a "Description" box on the article text and write your comments and corrections.
o In order for the process between the reviewers and the author(s) to be maintained with double-blind by keeping the identity information confidential, the name of the reviewer should not appear in the "Description" boxes you open on the article text.