Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2023, Cilt: 37 Sayı: 2, 363 - 372, 30.08.2023

Öz

Destekleyen Kurum

Selçuk Üniversitesi BAP Koordinatörlüğü

Proje Numarası

20201072

Kaynakça

  • Agegnehu M, Honermeier B (1997). Effects of seeding rates and nitrogen fertilization on seed yield, seed quality and yield components of false flax (Camelina sativa Crtz). Die Bodenkultur, 48 (1): 15-21.
  • Atakişi İK (1991). Yağ Bitkileri Yetiştirme ve Islahı. Trakya Üniv. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fak. Yayınları. Tekirdağ, 149-150.
  • Berti M, Wilckens R, Fischer S, Solis A, Johnson B (2011). Seeding date influence on camelina seed yield, yield components, and oil content in Chile. Industrial Crops and Products, 34: 1358–1365.
  • Crowley JG, Fröhlich A (1999). Evaluation of Camelina sativa as an alternative oilseed crop. (ISBN 1-84170-049-5) Teagasc, Dublin, Irlanda.
  • Çoban F, Önder M (2014). Ekim sıklıklarının ketencik [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] bitkisinde önemli agronomik özellikler üzerine etkileri. Selçuk Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 1 (2): 50-55.
  • Dağ Subaş E (2022). Farklı ekim zamanlarının ketencik [Camelina sativa (L.) crantz] bitkisinin verim ve verim öğeleri üzerine etkisinin değerlendirilmesi. Master Thesis, Yozgat Bozok University (Unpublished), Turkiye.
  • Deng JC, Li XM, Xiao XL, Wu HJ, Yang CQ, Long XY, ... Jiang LIU (2022). Field mold stress induced catabolism of storage reserves in soybean seed and the resulting deterioration of seed quality in the field. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 21: 336-350.
  • Harmankaya M, Ceyhan E, Çelik AS, Sert H, Kahraman A, Ozcan M (2016). Some chemical properties, mineral content and aminoacid composition of cowpeas [Vigna sinensis (L.) Savi]. Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods, 8 (1): 111-116. DOI: 10.3920/QAS2014.0487. ISSN: 1757-8361
  • İncekara F (1964). Endüstri Bitkileri ve Islahı Cilt: 2, Yağ Bitkileri ve Islahı. Ege Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Yay. No:83. İzmir.
  • Kahraman A (2017). Nutritional value and foliar fertilization in soybean. Journal of Elementology, 22 (1): 55-66, DOI: 10.5601/jelem.2016.21.1.1106. WOS:000390783900005
  • Kahraman A (2022). Evaluation of legume farming in Turkey and agricultural sustainability. Legume Research – An International Journal, doi: 10.18805/LRF-697
  • Kahraman A, Onder M (2018). Accumulation of heavy metals in dry beans sown on different dates. Journal of Elementology, 23 (1): 201-216. DOI: 10.5601/jelem.2017.22.2.1308
  • Karahoca A, Kırıcı S (2005). Çukurova koşullarında ketencik (Camelina sativa L.)’de farklı azot ve fosfor gübrelemesinin tohum verimi ve yağ oranına etkileri. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Dergisi, 20 (2): 47-55.
  • Katar D, Arslan Y, Subaşı İ (2012). Kışlık farklı ekim zamanlarının ketencik (Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz) bitkisinin verim ve verim öğelerine etkisi. GOÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 29 (1). 105-112.
  • Koç N (2014). Farklı zamanlarda ekilen ketencik [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz]'in verim ve bazı agronomik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, 2014.
  • Koçer G (2022). Isparta ekolojik koşullarında bazı ketencik [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] genotiplerin tarımsal ve yağ kalite özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Master Thesis, Isparta Uygulamalı Bilimler University (Unpublished), Turkiye.
  • Koncius D, Karcauskiene D (2010). The effect of nitrogen fertilizers, sowing time and seed rate on the productivity of Camelina sativa. Agriculture, 97 (4): 37-46.
  • Kurt O, Göre M (2018). Samsun ekolojik koşullarında bazı ketencik [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz.] genotiplerin önemli tarımsal karakterlerinin belirlenmesi. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 55 (2): 179-186.
  • Mason H (2009a). Yield and yield component responses to camelina seeding rate and genotype. http:/ag.montana.edu/nwarc/research/CroppingSystems/Camelina/09CSeeding Rate Genotype.pdf.
  • Mason H (2009b). Statewide Camelina Variety Evaluation. http://ag.montana.edu/nwarc/research/VarietyEvaluation/CanolaandCamelina/10StwdCamVarEval.pdf.
  • Mason H (2010). Statewide Camelina Variety Evaluation. http://ag.montana.edu/nwarc/research/VarietyEvaluation/CanolaandCamelina/1.
  • Mondor M, Hernández-Álvarez AJ (2022). Camelina sativa composition, attributes, and applications: a review. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 124 (3). 2100035. ISSN 1438-7697.
  • Onder M, Kahraman A (2016). A promising plant for biofuel: Determination of desired characteristics in camelina varieties/2. International Conference on Science, Ecology and Technology-2016 (ICONSETE'2016). Proceeding Book, Pp: 434-439 (Oral Presentation).
  • Paulsen HM (2007). Organic mixed cropping systems with oilseeds: 1. yields of mixed cropping systems of legumes or spring wheat with false flax (Camelina sativa L. Crantz). Landbauforsch Völkenrode, 57: 107–117.
  • Sadhuram Y, Maneesha K, Ramana TV (2010). Camelina sativa: A new crop with potential introduced in India. Current Science, 99 (9): 1194-1196.
  • Saucke H, Ackermann K (2006). Weed suppression in mixed cropped grain peas and false flax (Camelina sativa). Weed Research, 46: 453–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2006.00530.x.
  • Tamer N, Başalma D, Türkmen C, Namlı A (2016). Organik toprak düzenleyicilerin toprak parametreleri ve ayçiçeği (Helianthus annuus L.) bitkisinin verim ve verim öğeleri üzerine etkileri. Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Dergisi, 4 (1): 11 – 21.
  • Tura M, Mandrioli M, Valli E, Rubino RC, Parentela D, Gallina Toschi T (2022). Changes in the composition of a cold-pressed hemp seed oil during three months of storage. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 106: Article 104270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2021.104270
  • Vollmann J, Damboeck A, Eckl A, Schrems H, Ruckenbauer P (1996). Improvement of Camelina sativa, an underexploited oilseed. p. 357-362. In: J. Janick (ed.), Progress in new crops. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA.
  • Yağmur B, Okur B (2017). Potasyum ve humik asit uygulamalarının yağlık ayçiçeği (Helianthus annuus L.) bitkisinin gelişimine etkisi. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4 (3): 210-217.
  • Yenigün O (2021). Sürdürülebilir koşullarda farklı dozlarda potasyum uygulamasının ayçiçeğinin (Helianthus annuus cv. Roseta) verimine ve kalitesine etkisi. Master Thesis, Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University (Unpublished), Turkiye.
  • Yıldırım H, Önder M (2016). Farklı gübre dozlarının ketencik [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] bitkisinde bazı verim ve kalite bileşenlerine etkileri. Selçuk Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 3 (1): 117-122.
  • Zubr J (1997). Oil-seed crop; Camelina sativa. Industrial Crops and Products, 6: 113-119.

Effect of Potassium Doses on Agricultural Characteristics of Camelina Sown in Winter and Summer Season

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 37 Sayı: 2, 363 - 372, 30.08.2023

Öz

This research carried out in Konya ecology, Arslanbey camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] genotype which was planted in 2 different times as winter and summer, in the vegetation period of 2020, was determined at 6 different doses (0 kg da-1, 10 kg da-1, 15 kg da-1, 20 kg da-1, 25 kg da-1, 30 kg da-1) potassium sulphate fertilizer was applied to the soil and its effects on some agricultural properties were determined. Field trials of the study were established according to the Random Blocks trial design with 3 replications.
As the results of the research in summer plantings, plant height 50.23-54.01 cm, number of branches per plant 5.60-8.80, number of capsules per plant 30.87-58.80, number of seeds per capsule 14.10-17.60, first capsule height 39.55-45.28 cm, seed yield per plant 0.28-1.27 grams, the number of seeds per plant 252.53-1166.13, thousand grain weight 0.78-1.12 grams, grain yield 63.76-77.75 kg da-1, oil rate 22.54%-29.66%, oil yield between 14.05-22.25 kg da-1.
Additionally, the values obtained as a result of the winter planting of camelina; plant height 52.04-57.74 cm, number of branches per plant 8.33-11.70, number of capsules per plant 199.80-274.67, number of seeds in capsule 11.50-13.23, height of first capsule 41.01-47.17 cm, grain yield 1.24-1.65 grams per plant, number of seeds per plant 1754.43-2424.00 pieces, thousand grain weight 0.69-0.85 grams, grain yield 80.65-125.93 kg da-1, oil rate 14.47-18.77%, oil yield 11.97-19.74 kg da-1.
It can be said that it is essential to carry out long-term different agronomic studies in different locations related to camelina, an important and alternative oil plant.

Proje Numarası

20201072

Kaynakça

  • Agegnehu M, Honermeier B (1997). Effects of seeding rates and nitrogen fertilization on seed yield, seed quality and yield components of false flax (Camelina sativa Crtz). Die Bodenkultur, 48 (1): 15-21.
  • Atakişi İK (1991). Yağ Bitkileri Yetiştirme ve Islahı. Trakya Üniv. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fak. Yayınları. Tekirdağ, 149-150.
  • Berti M, Wilckens R, Fischer S, Solis A, Johnson B (2011). Seeding date influence on camelina seed yield, yield components, and oil content in Chile. Industrial Crops and Products, 34: 1358–1365.
  • Crowley JG, Fröhlich A (1999). Evaluation of Camelina sativa as an alternative oilseed crop. (ISBN 1-84170-049-5) Teagasc, Dublin, Irlanda.
  • Çoban F, Önder M (2014). Ekim sıklıklarının ketencik [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] bitkisinde önemli agronomik özellikler üzerine etkileri. Selçuk Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 1 (2): 50-55.
  • Dağ Subaş E (2022). Farklı ekim zamanlarının ketencik [Camelina sativa (L.) crantz] bitkisinin verim ve verim öğeleri üzerine etkisinin değerlendirilmesi. Master Thesis, Yozgat Bozok University (Unpublished), Turkiye.
  • Deng JC, Li XM, Xiao XL, Wu HJ, Yang CQ, Long XY, ... Jiang LIU (2022). Field mold stress induced catabolism of storage reserves in soybean seed and the resulting deterioration of seed quality in the field. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 21: 336-350.
  • Harmankaya M, Ceyhan E, Çelik AS, Sert H, Kahraman A, Ozcan M (2016). Some chemical properties, mineral content and aminoacid composition of cowpeas [Vigna sinensis (L.) Savi]. Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods, 8 (1): 111-116. DOI: 10.3920/QAS2014.0487. ISSN: 1757-8361
  • İncekara F (1964). Endüstri Bitkileri ve Islahı Cilt: 2, Yağ Bitkileri ve Islahı. Ege Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Yay. No:83. İzmir.
  • Kahraman A (2017). Nutritional value and foliar fertilization in soybean. Journal of Elementology, 22 (1): 55-66, DOI: 10.5601/jelem.2016.21.1.1106. WOS:000390783900005
  • Kahraman A (2022). Evaluation of legume farming in Turkey and agricultural sustainability. Legume Research – An International Journal, doi: 10.18805/LRF-697
  • Kahraman A, Onder M (2018). Accumulation of heavy metals in dry beans sown on different dates. Journal of Elementology, 23 (1): 201-216. DOI: 10.5601/jelem.2017.22.2.1308
  • Karahoca A, Kırıcı S (2005). Çukurova koşullarında ketencik (Camelina sativa L.)’de farklı azot ve fosfor gübrelemesinin tohum verimi ve yağ oranına etkileri. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Dergisi, 20 (2): 47-55.
  • Katar D, Arslan Y, Subaşı İ (2012). Kışlık farklı ekim zamanlarının ketencik (Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz) bitkisinin verim ve verim öğelerine etkisi. GOÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 29 (1). 105-112.
  • Koç N (2014). Farklı zamanlarda ekilen ketencik [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz]'in verim ve bazı agronomik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, 2014.
  • Koçer G (2022). Isparta ekolojik koşullarında bazı ketencik [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] genotiplerin tarımsal ve yağ kalite özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Master Thesis, Isparta Uygulamalı Bilimler University (Unpublished), Turkiye.
  • Koncius D, Karcauskiene D (2010). The effect of nitrogen fertilizers, sowing time and seed rate on the productivity of Camelina sativa. Agriculture, 97 (4): 37-46.
  • Kurt O, Göre M (2018). Samsun ekolojik koşullarında bazı ketencik [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz.] genotiplerin önemli tarımsal karakterlerinin belirlenmesi. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 55 (2): 179-186.
  • Mason H (2009a). Yield and yield component responses to camelina seeding rate and genotype. http:/ag.montana.edu/nwarc/research/CroppingSystems/Camelina/09CSeeding Rate Genotype.pdf.
  • Mason H (2009b). Statewide Camelina Variety Evaluation. http://ag.montana.edu/nwarc/research/VarietyEvaluation/CanolaandCamelina/10StwdCamVarEval.pdf.
  • Mason H (2010). Statewide Camelina Variety Evaluation. http://ag.montana.edu/nwarc/research/VarietyEvaluation/CanolaandCamelina/1.
  • Mondor M, Hernández-Álvarez AJ (2022). Camelina sativa composition, attributes, and applications: a review. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 124 (3). 2100035. ISSN 1438-7697.
  • Onder M, Kahraman A (2016). A promising plant for biofuel: Determination of desired characteristics in camelina varieties/2. International Conference on Science, Ecology and Technology-2016 (ICONSETE'2016). Proceeding Book, Pp: 434-439 (Oral Presentation).
  • Paulsen HM (2007). Organic mixed cropping systems with oilseeds: 1. yields of mixed cropping systems of legumes or spring wheat with false flax (Camelina sativa L. Crantz). Landbauforsch Völkenrode, 57: 107–117.
  • Sadhuram Y, Maneesha K, Ramana TV (2010). Camelina sativa: A new crop with potential introduced in India. Current Science, 99 (9): 1194-1196.
  • Saucke H, Ackermann K (2006). Weed suppression in mixed cropped grain peas and false flax (Camelina sativa). Weed Research, 46: 453–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2006.00530.x.
  • Tamer N, Başalma D, Türkmen C, Namlı A (2016). Organik toprak düzenleyicilerin toprak parametreleri ve ayçiçeği (Helianthus annuus L.) bitkisinin verim ve verim öğeleri üzerine etkileri. Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Dergisi, 4 (1): 11 – 21.
  • Tura M, Mandrioli M, Valli E, Rubino RC, Parentela D, Gallina Toschi T (2022). Changes in the composition of a cold-pressed hemp seed oil during three months of storage. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 106: Article 104270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2021.104270
  • Vollmann J, Damboeck A, Eckl A, Schrems H, Ruckenbauer P (1996). Improvement of Camelina sativa, an underexploited oilseed. p. 357-362. In: J. Janick (ed.), Progress in new crops. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA.
  • Yağmur B, Okur B (2017). Potasyum ve humik asit uygulamalarının yağlık ayçiçeği (Helianthus annuus L.) bitkisinin gelişimine etkisi. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4 (3): 210-217.
  • Yenigün O (2021). Sürdürülebilir koşullarda farklı dozlarda potasyum uygulamasının ayçiçeğinin (Helianthus annuus cv. Roseta) verimine ve kalitesine etkisi. Master Thesis, Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University (Unpublished), Turkiye.
  • Yıldırım H, Önder M (2016). Farklı gübre dozlarının ketencik [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] bitkisinde bazı verim ve kalite bileşenlerine etkileri. Selçuk Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 3 (1): 117-122.
  • Zubr J (1997). Oil-seed crop; Camelina sativa. Industrial Crops and Products, 6: 113-119.
Toplam 33 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Agronomi
Bölüm ART
Yazarlar

Hasan Hüseyin Sametoğlu 0000-0003-2991-6023

Mustafa Önder 0000-0001-7190-4099

Proje Numarası 20201072
Erken Görünüm Tarihi 30 Ağustos 2023
Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Ağustos 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 13 Temmuz 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 37 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

EndNote Sametoğlu HH, Önder M (01 Ağustos 2023) Effect of Potassium Doses on Agricultural Characteristics of Camelina Sown in Winter and Summer Season. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences 37 2 363–372.

Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY NC) ile lisanslanmıştır.