Öz
This study was conducted to adapt the Successful Aging Inventory (SAI) into Turkish and to determine its validity/reliability. The study is a methodological type study. The data were collected by face-to-face interview method in a nursing home and different seven district in Burdur province. The sample of the study consisted of 115 elderly individuals over the age of 60. Adaptation steps were made according to internationally accepted scientific methods. Accordingly, the factor loads of the items were between .41 and .89, the correlation coefficient between the score for each item and the scale score was r=.21-.65; correlation coefficient of each subscale item and subscale score is r=.57-.90 (p<.001). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient is .81 for the whole scale and .62-.86 for the subscales. There was no significant difference in the test-retest analysis performed to determine the difference between the two separate applications of the scale (p>.05). In this study, it was concluded that the Turkish version of SAI is a valid and reliable tool and can be used in practice and research.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- 1. Ağar A. Yaşlılarda gelecek nesiller. Ordu Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Çalışmaları Dergisi. 2020; 3 : 347-354.
- 2. Tereci D, Turan G, Nergis K.A.S.A, Öncel T, Arslansoyu N. Yaşlılık kavramına bir bakış. Ufkun Ötesi Bilim Dergisi. 2016;16: 84-116.
- 3. The World Bank Data Bank 2018. [Internet] Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.65UP.TO.ZS Erişim Tarihi: 06.06.2019.
- 4. Kutsal YG. Why geriatrics? Turk J Phys Med Rehab. 2009: 55 Suppl 2; 51-6. (In Turkish)
- 5. EUROSTAT 2019. [Internet] Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3433488/5369497/CA-NK-00-003-EN.PDF/214252de-63ca-4fd0-9cfd-675860434b52?version=1.0 Accessed: 12.07.2021
- 6. Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK) Elderly statistics. 2018. [Internet] http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/Start.do;jsessionid=vv2YZpnb6n8Sn0Cf3FmfWy0CKsQyWTQsdZgfwTby8pG7Dy28jpD4!-586725009 Accessed: 12.07.2021 05.03.2019
- 7. Beğer T, Yavuzer H. Aging and Aging epidemiology. Journal of Clinical Development. 2012; 25: 1-3. (In Turkish)
- 8. Kozar-Westman M, Troutman-Jordan M, Nies MA. Successful Aging Among Assisted Living Community Older Adults. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2013; 45:3, 238–246.
- 9. Odell Howie L, Troutman-Jordan M, Newman AM. Social Support and Successful Aging in Assisted Living Residents. Educational Gerontology. 2014; 40: 61–70.
- 10. Agostino Di C, Piero P. The environment as a determinant of successful aging or frailty. Mech Ageing Dev. 2020 188:111244.
- 11. Di Ciaula A, Portincasa P. The environment as a determinant of successful aging or frailty. Mechanisms of ageing and development. 2020; 188, 111244.
- 12. Reich AJ, Claunch KD, Verdeja MA et al. What Does “Successful Aging” Mean to you?Systematic Review and Cross-Cultural Comparison of Lay Perspectives of Older Adults in 13 Countries, 2010–2020. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology. 2020; 1-24.
- 13. Troutman M, Nies MA, Small S, BatesA. The Development and Testing of an Instrument to Measure Successful Aging. Research in Gerontological Nursing. 2011; 4 (3), 221-232.
- 14. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. SPINE. 2000; 25, 24, 3186-3191.
- 15. Çapık C, Gözüm S, Aksayan S. Intercultural Scale Adaptation Stages, Language and Culture Adaptation:Updated Guideline. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing. 2018; 26: 199-210.
- 16. Devellis RF, Thorpe CT. Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage publications, 2021.
- 17. Tavşancıl E. Measuring attitudes and data analysis with SPSS. (6th ed.), Nobel Publishing, İstanbul 2019.
- 18. Gözüm S, Aksayan S. Guidelines for cross-cultural scale adaptation II: Psychometric properties and cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Research and Development in Nursing. 2003; 5, 3-14.
- 19. Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. (7th ed.). Wolters Kluwer & Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia 2010.
- 20. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30:459-67.
- 21. Yeşilyurt S, Çapraz C. A Road Map for the Content Validity Used in Scale Development Studies. Journal of Erzincan University Faculty of Education. 2018; 20: 251-264 .
- 22. Şimşek ÖF. Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling Basic Principles and Applications of LISREL. Ekinoks Publishing Ankara 2007.
- 23. lhan M, Çetin B. Comparing the Analysis Results of the Structural Equation Models (SEM) Conducted Using LISREL and AMOS. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology. 2014; 5: 26-42.
- 24. Harrington D. Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford University Press, 2009; Newyork, USA.
- 25. Akgül A. Statistical Analysis Techniques in Medical Research - SPSS Applications. 3rd Edition. Emek Ofset Ltd.Şti. Ankara 2005.
- 26. Alpar R. Applied Statistics and Validity-Reliability with Examples from Sports, Health and Educational Sciences. Detay Publishing Ankara 2014.
- 27. Ercan İ, Kan İ. Reliability and Validity in The Scales. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Medicine. 2004;30, 3, 211-216.
Öz
Bu çalışma, Başarılı Yaşlanma Envanteri’nin (BYE) Türkçe versiyonunun geçerlik ve güvenirliğini belirlemek amacıyla metodolojik tipte yapılmıştır. Veriler Burdur'da bir huzurevinde ve yedi farklı ilçedeki mahallerden yüz yüze görüşme yöntemiyle toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini 60 yaş üstü 115 yaşlı birey oluşturmuştur. Uyarlama adımları uluslararası kabul görmüş bilimsel yöntemlere göre yapılmıştır. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliği doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile yapılmış ve maddelerin faktör yükleri .41 ile .89 arasında bulunmuştur. Her bir madde puanı ile ölçek puanı arasındaki korelasyon katsayısının r=.21-.65; her bir alt ölçek maddesi ile alt ölçek puanının korelasyon katsayısı r=.57-.90; alt ölçek puanı ile ölçek puanının korelasyon katsayısının ise r=.33-.81 olduğu saptanmıitır. Bu sonuçlar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki belirlenmiştir (p<.001). Cronbach alfa korelasyon katsayısı ölçeğin tamamı için .81, alt ölçekler için .62-.86 olarak bulunmuştur. Test-tekrar test güvenirlik analizinde ölçeğin iki ayrı uygulaması arasında anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır (p>.05). Bu çalışma, BYE’nin psikometrik versiyonunun geçerli ve güvenilir olduğunu ve yaşlı bakımı araştırma ve uygulamalarında kullanılabileceğini belirlemiştir.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- 1. Ağar A. Yaşlılarda gelecek nesiller. Ordu Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Çalışmaları Dergisi. 2020; 3 : 347-354.
- 2. Tereci D, Turan G, Nergis K.A.S.A, Öncel T, Arslansoyu N. Yaşlılık kavramına bir bakış. Ufkun Ötesi Bilim Dergisi. 2016;16: 84-116.
- 3. The World Bank Data Bank 2018. [Internet] Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.65UP.TO.ZS Erişim Tarihi: 06.06.2019.
- 4. Kutsal YG. Why geriatrics? Turk J Phys Med Rehab. 2009: 55 Suppl 2; 51-6. (In Turkish)
- 5. EUROSTAT 2019. [Internet] Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3433488/5369497/CA-NK-00-003-EN.PDF/214252de-63ca-4fd0-9cfd-675860434b52?version=1.0 Accessed: 12.07.2021
- 6. Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK) Elderly statistics. 2018. [Internet] http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/Start.do;jsessionid=vv2YZpnb6n8Sn0Cf3FmfWy0CKsQyWTQsdZgfwTby8pG7Dy28jpD4!-586725009 Accessed: 12.07.2021 05.03.2019
- 7. Beğer T, Yavuzer H. Aging and Aging epidemiology. Journal of Clinical Development. 2012; 25: 1-3. (In Turkish)
- 8. Kozar-Westman M, Troutman-Jordan M, Nies MA. Successful Aging Among Assisted Living Community Older Adults. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2013; 45:3, 238–246.
- 9. Odell Howie L, Troutman-Jordan M, Newman AM. Social Support and Successful Aging in Assisted Living Residents. Educational Gerontology. 2014; 40: 61–70.
- 10. Agostino Di C, Piero P. The environment as a determinant of successful aging or frailty. Mech Ageing Dev. 2020 188:111244.
- 11. Di Ciaula A, Portincasa P. The environment as a determinant of successful aging or frailty. Mechanisms of ageing and development. 2020; 188, 111244.
- 12. Reich AJ, Claunch KD, Verdeja MA et al. What Does “Successful Aging” Mean to you?Systematic Review and Cross-Cultural Comparison of Lay Perspectives of Older Adults in 13 Countries, 2010–2020. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology. 2020; 1-24.
- 13. Troutman M, Nies MA, Small S, BatesA. The Development and Testing of an Instrument to Measure Successful Aging. Research in Gerontological Nursing. 2011; 4 (3), 221-232.
- 14. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. SPINE. 2000; 25, 24, 3186-3191.
- 15. Çapık C, Gözüm S, Aksayan S. Intercultural Scale Adaptation Stages, Language and Culture Adaptation:Updated Guideline. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing. 2018; 26: 199-210.
- 16. Devellis RF, Thorpe CT. Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage publications, 2021.
- 17. Tavşancıl E. Measuring attitudes and data analysis with SPSS. (6th ed.), Nobel Publishing, İstanbul 2019.
- 18. Gözüm S, Aksayan S. Guidelines for cross-cultural scale adaptation II: Psychometric properties and cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Research and Development in Nursing. 2003; 5, 3-14.
- 19. Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. (7th ed.). Wolters Kluwer & Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia 2010.
- 20. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30:459-67.
- 21. Yeşilyurt S, Çapraz C. A Road Map for the Content Validity Used in Scale Development Studies. Journal of Erzincan University Faculty of Education. 2018; 20: 251-264 .
- 22. Şimşek ÖF. Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling Basic Principles and Applications of LISREL. Ekinoks Publishing Ankara 2007.
- 23. lhan M, Çetin B. Comparing the Analysis Results of the Structural Equation Models (SEM) Conducted Using LISREL and AMOS. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology. 2014; 5: 26-42.
- 24. Harrington D. Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford University Press, 2009; Newyork, USA.
- 25. Akgül A. Statistical Analysis Techniques in Medical Research - SPSS Applications. 3rd Edition. Emek Ofset Ltd.Şti. Ankara 2005.
- 26. Alpar R. Applied Statistics and Validity-Reliability with Examples from Sports, Health and Educational Sciences. Detay Publishing Ankara 2014.
- 27. Ercan İ, Kan İ. Reliability and Validity in The Scales. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Medicine. 2004;30, 3, 211-216.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi, Sağlık Hizmetleri ve Sistemleri (Diğer) |
| Bölüm | ORİJİNAL MAKALELER / ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 20 Temmuz 2023 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2023 Cilt: 45 Sayı: 4 |