Görüş Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Attaining sustainable energy transition or facing costs of delayed action: A case of Turkey

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 133 - 144, 28.12.2020

Mustafa Gökberk Urasoğlu Mustafa İlbaş

Öz

Apperceiving the materiality of energy transition, it is observed an enhancing effort and scoping in this field. Many countries have started stimulating studies and allotted extra budget for transition. In the last decade, some governments determined ambitious goals and applied policies to come true goals determined. Agreed two point are “energy efficiency” and “environment” along all the goals. It is irrefutable fact that policy makers will rev up because of the need of fast-react coming with developing technology. It is expected to occur new, more balanced, clean, clear and sustainable policies in the fallowing period. Paris Agreement has addressed climate change, its effects and necessity of stopping it. Some countries have taken action forthwith not to more arise matters from fossil fuel whereas others are late accordingly. In this study, sustainability of Turkey’s energy policies has been interrogated in terms of energy efficiency and environment. The official data has been collected from reports of Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources (MENR), International Energy Agency, Strategic Plan (2019-2023) of MENR and so forth. also, current and declared policies for future by MENR have been examined. The comparison of current and prospected situations including attain sustainable energy transition and encountering with their possible costs of delayed actions has been illustrated. The big data collected refers to Turkey needs to; attain sustainability and preserve it with implementation of renewable and environmental energy policies, enhance investment in renewable, nuclear energy power and energy efficiency, continue stimulating and encouraging capital investors to carry its Energy sector to a competitive dimension. Until 2030 the vital challenge in front of Turkey is funding of transition nonetheless Turkey made a huge progress in last two decades. Finally, the most effective movements for achieving the sustainable transition are discussed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sustainable Policy Energy Transition Energy Efficiency Environment

Kaynakça

  • [1] Speech of Minister of Energy and Natural Resources in Council, https://enerji.gov.tr/haber-detay?id=742, MENR, Accessed on: 21.12.2020
  • [2] Quantity of electricity consumption, https://enerji.gov.tr/bilgi-merkezi-enerji-elektrik, MENR, Accessed on: 21.12.2020
  • [3] Kick, C. (2011). "How is 100% renewable energy possible for Turkey by 2020." Global Energy Network Institute (GENI).
  • [4] Çapik, M., Yılmaz,A.O., Çavuşoğlu, İ. “Present situation and potential role renewable energy in Turkey” Renawable Energy, 46, 2012:46.
  • [5] Annual energy import, https://www.enerji.gov.tr/tr-TR/Bakanlik-Haberleri/Yillik-ortalama-45-milyar-dolarlik-enerji-ithalatimiz-var, MENR, Accessed on: 21.12.2020
  • [6] IEA, World Energy Outlook 2016, OECD/IEA, Paris, 2016 .
  • [7]Yorkan A. (2009). Energy Policy of the European Union and Its Effects on Turkey, Bilge Strateji, 2009:1(1); 24-39.
  • [8] Dağcı K., Çaman M.E., (2013). Enerji politikaları ve enerji güvenliği perspektifinden Avrupa Birliği’nin orta Asya politikası, OAKA,2013:8(16);21-48
  • [9] Duriau, V. J., Reger, R. & Pfarrer, M. D. A Content Analysis of the Content Analysis Literature in Organization Studies: Research Themes, Data Sources, and Methodological Refinements. Organization Research Methods, 2007:10; 5–34.
  • [10] GDP of Turkey according to years, https://databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx?source=2&type=metadata&series=NY.GDP.MK,TP.CD World Bank, Accessed on 21.12.2020
  • [11] Electricity consumption according to years, https://databank.worldbank.org/source/sustainable-energy-for-all/Type/CHART/preview/on, World Bank, Accessed on 21.12.2020
  • [12] The World Bank’s report, https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/global-economic-prospects#data, World Bank, Accessed on 21.12.2020
  • [13] Data on energy and environment, https://www.iea.org/countries/Turkey, IEA, Accessed on: 21.12.2020
  • [14] INDC of Turkey, https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/indc/Submission%20Pages/submissions.aspx, United Nations, Accessed on 21.12.2020
  • [15] Winning M., Price J., Ekins P., Pye S., Glynn J.,Watson J. & McGlade C. (2019) Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement and the costs of delayed action, Climate Policy, 2019:19(8); 947-958.
  • [16] Strategic Plan of MENR, https://sp.enerji.gov.tr, MENR, Accessed on: 21.12.2020
  • [17] Future predictions on energy, https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data tables?country=TURKEY&energy=Balances&year=2018, IEA, Accessed on: 21.12.2020

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 133 - 144, 28.12.2020

Mustafa Gökberk Urasoğlu Mustafa İlbaş

Öz

Kaynakça

  • [1] Speech of Minister of Energy and Natural Resources in Council, https://enerji.gov.tr/haber-detay?id=742, MENR, Accessed on: 21.12.2020
  • [2] Quantity of electricity consumption, https://enerji.gov.tr/bilgi-merkezi-enerji-elektrik, MENR, Accessed on: 21.12.2020
  • [3] Kick, C. (2011). "How is 100% renewable energy possible for Turkey by 2020." Global Energy Network Institute (GENI).
  • [4] Çapik, M., Yılmaz,A.O., Çavuşoğlu, İ. “Present situation and potential role renewable energy in Turkey” Renawable Energy, 46, 2012:46.
  • [5] Annual energy import, https://www.enerji.gov.tr/tr-TR/Bakanlik-Haberleri/Yillik-ortalama-45-milyar-dolarlik-enerji-ithalatimiz-var, MENR, Accessed on: 21.12.2020
  • [6] IEA, World Energy Outlook 2016, OECD/IEA, Paris, 2016 .
  • [7]Yorkan A. (2009). Energy Policy of the European Union and Its Effects on Turkey, Bilge Strateji, 2009:1(1); 24-39.
  • [8] Dağcı K., Çaman M.E., (2013). Enerji politikaları ve enerji güvenliği perspektifinden Avrupa Birliği’nin orta Asya politikası, OAKA,2013:8(16);21-48
  • [9] Duriau, V. J., Reger, R. & Pfarrer, M. D. A Content Analysis of the Content Analysis Literature in Organization Studies: Research Themes, Data Sources, and Methodological Refinements. Organization Research Methods, 2007:10; 5–34.
  • [10] GDP of Turkey according to years, https://databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx?source=2&type=metadata&series=NY.GDP.MK,TP.CD World Bank, Accessed on 21.12.2020
  • [11] Electricity consumption according to years, https://databank.worldbank.org/source/sustainable-energy-for-all/Type/CHART/preview/on, World Bank, Accessed on 21.12.2020
  • [12] The World Bank’s report, https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/global-economic-prospects#data, World Bank, Accessed on 21.12.2020
  • [13] Data on energy and environment, https://www.iea.org/countries/Turkey, IEA, Accessed on: 21.12.2020
  • [14] INDC of Turkey, https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/indc/Submission%20Pages/submissions.aspx, United Nations, Accessed on 21.12.2020
  • [15] Winning M., Price J., Ekins P., Pye S., Glynn J.,Watson J. & McGlade C. (2019) Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement and the costs of delayed action, Climate Policy, 2019:19(8); 947-958.
  • [16] Strategic Plan of MENR, https://sp.enerji.gov.tr, MENR, Accessed on: 21.12.2020
  • [17] Future predictions on energy, https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data tables?country=TURKEY&energy=Balances&year=2018, IEA, Accessed on: 21.12.2020
Toplam 17 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Çevresel Olarak Sürdürülebilir Mühendislik
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Mustafa Gökberk Urasoğlu 0000-0001-7509-8928

Mustafa İlbaş 0000-0001-6668-1484

Yayımlanma Tarihi 28 Aralık 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi 21 Aralık 2020
Kabul Tarihi 27 Aralık 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Urasoğlu, M. G., & İlbaş, M. (2020). Attaining sustainable energy transition or facing costs of delayed action: A case of Turkey. International Journal of Energy Studies, 5(2), 133-144.
AMA Urasoğlu MG, İlbaş M. Attaining sustainable energy transition or facing costs of delayed action: A case of Turkey. Int J Energy Studies. Aralık 2020;5(2):133-144.
Chicago Urasoğlu, Mustafa Gökberk, ve Mustafa İlbaş. “Attaining Sustainable Energy Transition or Facing Costs of Delayed Action: A Case of Turkey”. International Journal of Energy Studies 5, sy. 2 (Aralık 2020): 133-44.
EndNote Urasoğlu MG, İlbaş M (01 Aralık 2020) Attaining sustainable energy transition or facing costs of delayed action: A case of Turkey. International Journal of Energy Studies 5 2 133–144.
IEEE M. G. Urasoğlu ve M. İlbaş, “Attaining sustainable energy transition or facing costs of delayed action: A case of Turkey”, Int J Energy Studies, c. 5, sy. 2, ss. 133–144, 2020.
ISNAD Urasoğlu, Mustafa Gökberk - İlbaş, Mustafa. “Attaining Sustainable Energy Transition or Facing Costs of Delayed Action: A Case of Turkey”. International Journal of Energy Studies 5/2 (Aralık 2020), 133-144.
JAMA Urasoğlu MG, İlbaş M. Attaining sustainable energy transition or facing costs of delayed action: A case of Turkey. Int J Energy Studies. 2020;5:133–144.
MLA Urasoğlu, Mustafa Gökberk ve Mustafa İlbaş. “Attaining Sustainable Energy Transition or Facing Costs of Delayed Action: A Case of Turkey”. International Journal of Energy Studies, c. 5, sy. 2, 2020, ss. 133-44.
Vancouver Urasoğlu MG, İlbaş M. Attaining sustainable energy transition or facing costs of delayed action: A case of Turkey. Int J Energy Studies. 2020;5(2):133-44.
 Kapak Resmi İndir