Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

In Vitro Evaluation of Apricot Cultivars Response to Pseudomonas syringae Pathovars: Image Processing as an Alternative Method

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 3, 842 - 853, 25.09.2023

Mustafa Akbaba Kaan Hürkan Ahmet Erhan Karahan

https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1217921
Cited By: 1

Öz

Türkiye, with an apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) production amount of 833,398 tons per year, ranks first in fresh apricot production and dried apricot export in the world. Malatya, Iğdır, and Elazığ constitute the main apricot production centers in Turkey. Many table and dried apricot cultivars have been grown in Türkiye. Local apricot cultivars such as cv. Şalak (or Aprikoz), cv. Tebereze, cv. Ordubat, cv. Ağcanabat, and cv. Ağerik are widely grown in the Aras Valley, including Iğdır and Kağızman. In this study, DNA barcoding of local cultivars based on the ITS region was performed and their distribution demonstrated in the Aras Valley. The reactions of these apricot cultivars to the causal agents of bacterial canker, which negatively affect the yield and quality of apricot cultivation, were also determined. Alternative methods such as image-processing technology and CHAID analysis have also been successfully used for cultivar reaction tests. It was determined that "Şalak" is economically important and the most common apricot cultivar in the Aras Valley. In addition, the Ağcanabat cultivar was sensitive to the causal agents of disease, while other local apricot cultivars were tolerant to it.

Anahtar Kelimeler

stone fruits local cultivars bacterial canker DNA barcoding CHAID

Destekleyen Kurum

The study was funded by Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK)

Proje Numarası

120O825

Teşekkür

We are grateful to Dr. Monika Kaluzna (POLAND) and Prof. Dr. Hatice Özaktan for providing the reference strains that were used in this study. Furthermore, we also thank Sezer Şiktaş and Doç. Dr. Nihal Acarsoy Bilgin helped us with the survey of apricot orchards.

Kaynakça

  • References Abacı Z T & Asma B M (2010). Bazı kayısı çeşitlerinin farklı ekolojik alanlardaki biyolojik özelliklerinin analizi. Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 3(1):165-168.
  • Ahmad M & Morgan V (1994). Characterization of a cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) rhizobiophage and its effect on cowpea nodulation and growth. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 18:297-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00570632
  • Akbaba M & Özaktan H (2021). Evaluation of bacteriophages in the biocontrol of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae isolated from cankers on sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) in Turkey. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control, 31(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-021-00385-7
  • Akın M, Eyduran E & Reed B M (2017). Use of RSM and CHAID data mining algorithm for predicting mineral nutrition of hazelnut. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 128(2):317-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-016-1110-6
  • Alim M & Kaya G (2005). Iğdır'da kayısı tarımı ve başlıca sorunları. Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi,10(14):47-65.https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ataunidcd/issue/2435/30937
  • Asma B M (2000). Kayısı Yetiştiriciliği. Evin Ofset, Malatya.
  • Asma B M & Ozturk K (2005). Analysis of morphological, pomological and yield characteristics of some apricot germplasm in Turkey. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 52:305–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-003-1384-5
  • Aydin A, Ince A G, Uygur Gocer E & Karaca M (2018). Single cotton seed DNA extraction without the use of enzymes and liquid nitrogen. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 27(10):6722-6726.
  • Bakır M, Dumanoğlu H, Erdoğan, V, Ernim C & Macit T (2019). Characterization of wild apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) genotypes selected from Cappadocia Region (Nevşehir-Turkey) by SSR markers. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 25 (4):498-507. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.457850
  • Batnini M A, Bourguiba H, Trifi-Farah N & Krichen L (2019). Molecular diversity and phylogeny of Tunisian Prunus armeniaca L. by evaluating three candidate barcodes of the chloroplast genome. Scientia Horticulturae, 245:99-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.09.071
  • Bibi S, Inam-ul-Haq M, Riaz A & Malik S I (2022). Identification of Host Resistance against bacterial canker disease on apricot, plum and peach grown in Punjab and KPK. International Journal of Plant Pathology, 11(1):43-48. https://doi.org/10.33687/phytopath.011.01.4130
  • Bora T & Karaca İ (1970). Kültür bitkilerinde hastalığın ve zararın ölçülmesi, ege üniversitesi ziraat fakültesi yardımcı ders kitabı, bornova-izmir, yayın no: 167,43s (in turkish).
  • Bourguiba H, Krichen L, Audergon J M & et al. (2010). Impact of mapped SSR markers on the genetic diversity of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) in Tunisia. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 28, 578–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-010-0189-x
  • Bülbül M & Mirik M (2014). Tekirdağ’da kiraz ağaçlarında bakteriyel kanser etmenlerinin yaygınlığı, izolasyonu ve tanımlanması üzerinde araştırmalar. Journal of Turkish Phytopathology, 43(1–3):15–24
  • Cetinkaya Yildiz R, Karatas A, Horuz S & et al. (2022). Determination of susceptibility of citrus and stone fruit cultivars against Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae in Turkey. Gesunde Pflanzen, 74:639–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00638-x
  • Donmez MF, Karlidag H & Esitken A (2010). Identification of resistance to bacterial canker (Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae) disease on apricot genotypes grown in Turkey. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 126:241-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-009-9536-x
  • Ercisli S (2009). Apricot culture in Turkey. Scientific Research and Essays, 4(8):715-719. Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/SRE
  • Erkek E (2017). Amasya ili kiraz ağaçlarındaki epifitik ve patojenik bakteriyel etmenlerin belirlenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, 64s (yayımlanmamış)
  • FAO (2020). Production of Apricots: top 10 producers. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualize Accessed 13 October 2022
  • Gilbert V, Planchon V, Legros F, Maraite H & Bultreys A (2010). Pathogenicity and aggressiveness in populations of Pseudomonas syringae from Belgian fruit orchards. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 126:263–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-009-9538-8
  • Giovanardi D, Ferrante P, Scortichini M & Stefani E (2018). Characterisation of Pseudomonas syringae isolates from apricot orchards in north-eastern Italy. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 151(4):901-917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-018-1424-9
  • Görmez A, Sahin F, Gulluce M & Aslan, I (2013). Identification and characterization of Pseudomonas syringae isolated from apricot trees in the Erzurum province of Turkey and evaluation of cultivar reaction. Journal of Plant Pathology, 525-532.
  • Gulyás G, Sramkó G, Molnár V A, Rudnóy S, Illyés Z, Balázs T & Bratek Z (2005). Nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS paralogs as evidence of recent interspecific hybridization in the genus Ophrys (Orchidaceae). Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica, 47(2):61-67.
  • Hulin M T, Jackson R W, Harrison R J & Mansfield, J W (2020). Cherry picking by pseudomonads: after a century of research on canker, genomics provides insights into the evolution of pathogenicity towards stone fruits. Plant Pathology, 69(6):962-978. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13189
  • Hürkan, K (2020). Analysis of various DNA barcodes on the turkish protected designation of origin apricot “Iğdır Kayısısı”(Prunus armeniaca cv. Şalak). Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 8(9):1982-1987. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i9.1982-1987.3594
  • Kavak H & Çitir A (1995). Malatya ili merkez ilçede kayisilarda görülen hastaliklarin tanilari ve yayginlik oranlari üzerine araştırmalar. VII. Türkiye Fitopatoloji Bildirileri, Adana, Ekim. (In Turkish)
  • Kaya T, Pehluvan M, Doğru B & Bozhüyük M R (2013). Aprikoz (Şalak) Kayısı Ağaçlarında Farklı Yaş Grupların.ın Meyve Dalı Profili ve Meyve Tutum Oranı Üzerine Etkisi. Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 2:77-81, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tabad/issue/34794/385304
  • Kennelly M M, Cazorla F M, de Vicente A, Ramos C & Sundin G W (2007). Pseudomonas syringae diseases of fruit trees: progress toward understanding and control. Plant Disease, 91(1):4-17. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-91-0004
  • Koc A, Karahan A E & Bingül M (2019). Determination of relationship between land surface temperature and different land use by chaid analysis. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17(3):6051-6067. http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1703_60516067
  • Kotan R & Sahin F (2002). First record of bacterial canker caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae on apricot trees in Turkey. Plant Pathology, 51:798. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3059.2002.00768.x
  • Lamichhane J R, Varvaro L, Parisi L, Audergon J M & Morris C E (2014). Disease and frost damage of woody plants caused by Pseudomonas syringae: seeing the forest for the trees. Advances in Agronomy, 126:235–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800132-5.00004-3
  • Li B, Hulin M T, Brain P, Mansfield J W, Jackson R W & Harrison R J (2015). Rapid, automated detection of stem canker symptoms in woody perennials using artificial neural network analysis. Plant Methods, 11(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-015-0100-8
  • Lindow S E, Arny D C & Upper C D (1982). Bacterial ice nucleation: a factor in frost injury to plants. Plant Physiology, 70(4):1084–1089. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.70.4.1084
  • Mirik M, Baloglu S, Aysan Y, Cetinkaya-Yildiz R, Kusek M, Sahin F (2005). First outbreak and occurrence of citrus blast disease, caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae, on orange and mandarin trees in Türkiye. Plant Pathology, 54(2):238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2005.01134.x
  • Morris C E, Bardin M, Kinkel L L, Moury B, Nicot P C & Sands D C (2009). Expanding the paradigms of plant pathogen life history and evolution of parasitic fitness beyond agricultural boundaries. PLoS Pathogens 5, e1000693. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000693
  • Muradoğlu F, Pehluvan M, Gündoğdu M & Kaya, T (2011). Iğdır yöresinde yetiştirilen bazı kayısı (Prunus armeniaca L.) genotiplerin fizikokimyasal özellikleri ile mineral içerikleri. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(1):17-22. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jist/issue/7924/104203
  • Özaktan H, Akkopru A, Bozkurt A & Erdal M (2008). Information on peach bacterial canker in Aegean Region of Turkey. In Proceedings of STF Meeting on “Determination of the incidence of the different pathovars of Pseudomonas syringae in stone fruits”COST Action 873 “Bacterial diseases of stone fruits and nuts”, Volume 8.
  • Özyörük C & Güleryüz M (1992). Iğdir ovasinda yetişen kayisi çeşitleri üzerinde pomolojik biyolojik ve fenolojik araştırmalar. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1):16-28.
  • Paydaş Kargı S, Kafkas E & Dikkaya Y R (2015). Düşük soğuklamalı bazı kayısı çeşitlerinin KKTC ekolojik koşullarına adaptasyonları (TAGEP PROJESİ:TAE-P2000014). Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi - KKTC Tarım ve Doğal Kaynaklar Bakanlığı (in turkish)
  • Pratt WK (1991). Digital Image Processing. New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., p. 634.
  • Sayed H A, Mostafa S, Haggag I M & Hassan N A (2022). DNA barcoding of prunus species collection conserved in the national gene bank of Egypt. Molecular Biotechnology, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-022-00530-z
  • Scortichini M, Pellegrino S & Berra L (1999). Susceptibility of apricot germplasm to natural infection by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae in Piedmont. Rivista di Frutticoltura e di Ortofloricoltura 61:83–86
  • Singh H V, Mir M S & Wani M A (2005). Effect of host genotypes and age of plant on resistance to gummosis disease in apricot of Kargil. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences, 13:152–155.
  • Sobiczewski P & Jones A L (1992). Effect of exposure to freezing temperatures on necrosis in sweet cherry shoots inoculated with Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae or P. s. morsprunorum. Plant Disease, 76:447-451. https://doi.org/10.1094/pd-76-0447
  • TÜİK (2021). Bitkisel Üretim İstatistikleri (Kayısı), https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=92&locale=tr, Accessed 10 October 2022
  • United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2022). Apricots, raw. https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/171697/nutrients, Accessed 13 October 2022
  • Weaver D J (1978). Interaction of Pseudomonas syringae and freezing in bacterial canker on excised peach twigs. Phytopathology 68:1460-1463. https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-68-1460
  • White T J, Bruns T, Lee S J W T & Taylor J (1990). Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications 18(1):315-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 3, 842 - 853, 25.09.2023

Mustafa Akbaba Kaan Hürkan Ahmet Erhan Karahan

https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1217921
Cited By: 1

Öz

Proje Numarası

120O825

Kaynakça

  • References Abacı Z T & Asma B M (2010). Bazı kayısı çeşitlerinin farklı ekolojik alanlardaki biyolojik özelliklerinin analizi. Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 3(1):165-168.
  • Ahmad M & Morgan V (1994). Characterization of a cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) rhizobiophage and its effect on cowpea nodulation and growth. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 18:297-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00570632
  • Akbaba M & Özaktan H (2021). Evaluation of bacteriophages in the biocontrol of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae isolated from cankers on sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) in Turkey. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control, 31(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-021-00385-7
  • Akın M, Eyduran E & Reed B M (2017). Use of RSM and CHAID data mining algorithm for predicting mineral nutrition of hazelnut. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 128(2):317-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-016-1110-6
  • Alim M & Kaya G (2005). Iğdır'da kayısı tarımı ve başlıca sorunları. Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi,10(14):47-65.https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ataunidcd/issue/2435/30937
  • Asma B M (2000). Kayısı Yetiştiriciliği. Evin Ofset, Malatya.
  • Asma B M & Ozturk K (2005). Analysis of morphological, pomological and yield characteristics of some apricot germplasm in Turkey. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 52:305–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-003-1384-5
  • Aydin A, Ince A G, Uygur Gocer E & Karaca M (2018). Single cotton seed DNA extraction without the use of enzymes and liquid nitrogen. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 27(10):6722-6726.
  • Bakır M, Dumanoğlu H, Erdoğan, V, Ernim C & Macit T (2019). Characterization of wild apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) genotypes selected from Cappadocia Region (Nevşehir-Turkey) by SSR markers. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 25 (4):498-507. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.457850
  • Batnini M A, Bourguiba H, Trifi-Farah N & Krichen L (2019). Molecular diversity and phylogeny of Tunisian Prunus armeniaca L. by evaluating three candidate barcodes of the chloroplast genome. Scientia Horticulturae, 245:99-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.09.071
  • Bibi S, Inam-ul-Haq M, Riaz A & Malik S I (2022). Identification of Host Resistance against bacterial canker disease on apricot, plum and peach grown in Punjab and KPK. International Journal of Plant Pathology, 11(1):43-48. https://doi.org/10.33687/phytopath.011.01.4130
  • Bora T & Karaca İ (1970). Kültür bitkilerinde hastalığın ve zararın ölçülmesi, ege üniversitesi ziraat fakültesi yardımcı ders kitabı, bornova-izmir, yayın no: 167,43s (in turkish).
  • Bourguiba H, Krichen L, Audergon J M & et al. (2010). Impact of mapped SSR markers on the genetic diversity of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) in Tunisia. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 28, 578–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-010-0189-x
  • Bülbül M & Mirik M (2014). Tekirdağ’da kiraz ağaçlarında bakteriyel kanser etmenlerinin yaygınlığı, izolasyonu ve tanımlanması üzerinde araştırmalar. Journal of Turkish Phytopathology, 43(1–3):15–24
  • Cetinkaya Yildiz R, Karatas A, Horuz S & et al. (2022). Determination of susceptibility of citrus and stone fruit cultivars against Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae in Turkey. Gesunde Pflanzen, 74:639–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00638-x
  • Donmez MF, Karlidag H & Esitken A (2010). Identification of resistance to bacterial canker (Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae) disease on apricot genotypes grown in Turkey. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 126:241-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-009-9536-x
  • Ercisli S (2009). Apricot culture in Turkey. Scientific Research and Essays, 4(8):715-719. Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/SRE
  • Erkek E (2017). Amasya ili kiraz ağaçlarındaki epifitik ve patojenik bakteriyel etmenlerin belirlenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, 64s (yayımlanmamış)
  • FAO (2020). Production of Apricots: top 10 producers. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualize Accessed 13 October 2022
  • Gilbert V, Planchon V, Legros F, Maraite H & Bultreys A (2010). Pathogenicity and aggressiveness in populations of Pseudomonas syringae from Belgian fruit orchards. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 126:263–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-009-9538-8
  • Giovanardi D, Ferrante P, Scortichini M & Stefani E (2018). Characterisation of Pseudomonas syringae isolates from apricot orchards in north-eastern Italy. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 151(4):901-917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-018-1424-9
  • Görmez A, Sahin F, Gulluce M & Aslan, I (2013). Identification and characterization of Pseudomonas syringae isolated from apricot trees in the Erzurum province of Turkey and evaluation of cultivar reaction. Journal of Plant Pathology, 525-532.
  • Gulyás G, Sramkó G, Molnár V A, Rudnóy S, Illyés Z, Balázs T & Bratek Z (2005). Nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS paralogs as evidence of recent interspecific hybridization in the genus Ophrys (Orchidaceae). Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica, 47(2):61-67.
  • Hulin M T, Jackson R W, Harrison R J & Mansfield, J W (2020). Cherry picking by pseudomonads: after a century of research on canker, genomics provides insights into the evolution of pathogenicity towards stone fruits. Plant Pathology, 69(6):962-978. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13189
  • Hürkan, K (2020). Analysis of various DNA barcodes on the turkish protected designation of origin apricot “Iğdır Kayısısı”(Prunus armeniaca cv. Şalak). Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 8(9):1982-1987. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i9.1982-1987.3594
  • Kavak H & Çitir A (1995). Malatya ili merkez ilçede kayisilarda görülen hastaliklarin tanilari ve yayginlik oranlari üzerine araştırmalar. VII. Türkiye Fitopatoloji Bildirileri, Adana, Ekim. (In Turkish)
  • Kaya T, Pehluvan M, Doğru B & Bozhüyük M R (2013). Aprikoz (Şalak) Kayısı Ağaçlarında Farklı Yaş Grupların.ın Meyve Dalı Profili ve Meyve Tutum Oranı Üzerine Etkisi. Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 2:77-81, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tabad/issue/34794/385304
  • Kennelly M M, Cazorla F M, de Vicente A, Ramos C & Sundin G W (2007). Pseudomonas syringae diseases of fruit trees: progress toward understanding and control. Plant Disease, 91(1):4-17. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-91-0004
  • Koc A, Karahan A E & Bingül M (2019). Determination of relationship between land surface temperature and different land use by chaid analysis. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17(3):6051-6067. http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1703_60516067
  • Kotan R & Sahin F (2002). First record of bacterial canker caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae on apricot trees in Turkey. Plant Pathology, 51:798. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3059.2002.00768.x
  • Lamichhane J R, Varvaro L, Parisi L, Audergon J M & Morris C E (2014). Disease and frost damage of woody plants caused by Pseudomonas syringae: seeing the forest for the trees. Advances in Agronomy, 126:235–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800132-5.00004-3
  • Li B, Hulin M T, Brain P, Mansfield J W, Jackson R W & Harrison R J (2015). Rapid, automated detection of stem canker symptoms in woody perennials using artificial neural network analysis. Plant Methods, 11(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-015-0100-8
  • Lindow S E, Arny D C & Upper C D (1982). Bacterial ice nucleation: a factor in frost injury to plants. Plant Physiology, 70(4):1084–1089. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.70.4.1084
  • Mirik M, Baloglu S, Aysan Y, Cetinkaya-Yildiz R, Kusek M, Sahin F (2005). First outbreak and occurrence of citrus blast disease, caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae, on orange and mandarin trees in Türkiye. Plant Pathology, 54(2):238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2005.01134.x
  • Morris C E, Bardin M, Kinkel L L, Moury B, Nicot P C & Sands D C (2009). Expanding the paradigms of plant pathogen life history and evolution of parasitic fitness beyond agricultural boundaries. PLoS Pathogens 5, e1000693. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000693
  • Muradoğlu F, Pehluvan M, Gündoğdu M & Kaya, T (2011). Iğdır yöresinde yetiştirilen bazı kayısı (Prunus armeniaca L.) genotiplerin fizikokimyasal özellikleri ile mineral içerikleri. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(1):17-22. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jist/issue/7924/104203
  • Özaktan H, Akkopru A, Bozkurt A & Erdal M (2008). Information on peach bacterial canker in Aegean Region of Turkey. In Proceedings of STF Meeting on “Determination of the incidence of the different pathovars of Pseudomonas syringae in stone fruits”COST Action 873 “Bacterial diseases of stone fruits and nuts”, Volume 8.
  • Özyörük C & Güleryüz M (1992). Iğdir ovasinda yetişen kayisi çeşitleri üzerinde pomolojik biyolojik ve fenolojik araştırmalar. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1):16-28.
  • Paydaş Kargı S, Kafkas E & Dikkaya Y R (2015). Düşük soğuklamalı bazı kayısı çeşitlerinin KKTC ekolojik koşullarına adaptasyonları (TAGEP PROJESİ:TAE-P2000014). Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi - KKTC Tarım ve Doğal Kaynaklar Bakanlığı (in turkish)
  • Pratt WK (1991). Digital Image Processing. New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., p. 634.
  • Sayed H A, Mostafa S, Haggag I M & Hassan N A (2022). DNA barcoding of prunus species collection conserved in the national gene bank of Egypt. Molecular Biotechnology, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-022-00530-z
  • Scortichini M, Pellegrino S & Berra L (1999). Susceptibility of apricot germplasm to natural infection by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae in Piedmont. Rivista di Frutticoltura e di Ortofloricoltura 61:83–86
  • Singh H V, Mir M S & Wani M A (2005). Effect of host genotypes and age of plant on resistance to gummosis disease in apricot of Kargil. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences, 13:152–155.
  • Sobiczewski P & Jones A L (1992). Effect of exposure to freezing temperatures on necrosis in sweet cherry shoots inoculated with Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae or P. s. morsprunorum. Plant Disease, 76:447-451. https://doi.org/10.1094/pd-76-0447
  • TÜİK (2021). Bitkisel Üretim İstatistikleri (Kayısı), https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=92&locale=tr, Accessed 10 October 2022
  • United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2022). Apricots, raw. https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/171697/nutrients, Accessed 13 October 2022
  • Weaver D J (1978). Interaction of Pseudomonas syringae and freezing in bacterial canker on excised peach twigs. Phytopathology 68:1460-1463. https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-68-1460
  • White T J, Bruns T, Lee S J W T & Taylor J (1990). Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications 18(1):315-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1
Toplam 48 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Ziraat Mühendisliği (Diğer)
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Mustafa Akbaba 0000-0002-7029-9461

Kaan Hürkan 0000-0001-5330-7442

Ahmet Erhan Karahan 0000-0001-6252-0640

Proje Numarası 120O825
Erken Görünüm Tarihi 24 Mayıs 2023
Yayımlanma Tarihi 25 Eylül 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 12 Aralık 2022
Kabul Tarihi 17 Şubat 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 29 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Akbaba, M., Hürkan, K., & Karahan, A. E. (2023). In Vitro Evaluation of Apricot Cultivars Response to Pseudomonas syringae Pathovars: Image Processing as an Alternative Method. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 29(3), 842-853. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1217921

Cited By

Effects of plant-derived smoke, karrikin, and salinity stress on Prunus armeniaca cv. Şalak seeds and seedlings: A morphological, biochemical, and molecular approach
Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1297788
 Kapak Resmi İndir

Journal of Agricultural Sciences is published open access journal. All articles are published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).