Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Farklı Dozlarda Fosfor ve Humik Asit Uygulamalarının Glayöl Çeşitlerinde Mikro Besin Elementi (Fe, Cu, Zn ve Mn) İçeriklerine Etkisi

Year 2018, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 319 - 325, 30.09.2018
https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.458669

Abstract

Bu araştırmada farklı dozlarda fosfor ve humik asit uygulamalarının glayöl çeşitlerinin besin elementi içeriği üzerine etkilerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Rose Supreme, Deppest Red ve Essential glayöl çeşitlerinin kullanıldığı denemede fosforun üç dozu (P1:0, P2:100, P3:200 mg kg-1) ve humik asidin üç dozu (HA1:0, HA2:1000, HA3:2000 mg kg-1) 3 kg yetiştirme ortamı içeren saksılara uygulanmıştır. Korm dikiminden 140 gün sonra deneme sonlandırılmıştır. Hasat edilen bitkilerde Fe, Cu, Zn ve Mn içerikleri analiz edilmiştir. Mikro besin elementi içeriği bakımından Cu hariç çeşitler arasında istatistiksel anlamda önemli farklılık bulunmamıştır. Cu içeriğinde farklı çeşitlerin meydana getirdiği değişim istatistiksel anlamda %5 düzeyinde önemli bulunmuştur. Farklı fosfor uygulamalarının bitkilerde Mn ve Cu içeriği üzerine etkilerinin istatistiksel anlamda %1 düzeyinde önemli olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bitkilerin Fe ve Cu içerikleri humik asit uygulamalarında istatistiksel olarak önemli (%1) düzeyde etkilenmişlerdir. Çinko ve Cu içeriklerinde çeşit x fosfor interaksiyonunun etkisi istatistiksel olarak %1 düzeyinde önemli bulunmuştur. Çeşit x Fosfor x Humik asit interaksiyonu ise Mn ve Cu içeriklerinde istatistiksel anlamda önemli (%1) değişimler meydana getirmiştir. En yüksek Fe ve Zn içerikleri HA’nın en yüksek dozunda sırasıyla 57.9 mg kg-1 ve 82.0 mg kg-1 olarak elde edilmiştir. En yüksek Cu içeriği ise HA’nın ikinci dozunda 11.4 mg kg-1 olarak bulunmuştur.

References

  • Adani, F., P. Genevini, P. Zaccheo, G. Zocchi, 1998. The effect of commercial humic acid on tomato plant growth andmineral nutrition. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 21(3); 561-575.
  • Allison, L.E., Moodie, C.D., 1965. Carbonate. In: C.A. Black et al (ed.) Methods of Soil Analaysis, Part 2, Agronomy Series, Am. Soc. of Argon., Inc., U.S.A., 9:1379-1400.
  • Alpaslan M, Güneş A, İnal A, 2005. Deneme Tekniği. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayın no:1543, Ders kitabı:496
  • Altan T. ve Altan S., 1984. Glayöl ve Gerbera Yetiştiriciliği, T.A.V. Yayınları, Yay. No: 6.
  • Anonim, 2015. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (www.tuik.gov.tr).
  • Baldotto MA, Munız RC, Baldotto L EB, Dobbss LB, 2011. Root growth of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh treated with humic acids isolated from typical soils of Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil. Revista Ceres, 58(4): 504-511.
  • Baldotto MA, Baldotto LEB, 2014. Ácidos húmicos. Revista Ceres, 61:856-881.
  • Chen Y, Avaid T, 1990. Effect of humic substances on plant growth. American society of agronomy and soil science (eds): Humic substances in soil and crop science; selected readings. American Society of Agronom, Madison, WI, 161-186.
  • Gülser F, Çığ A, Sönmez F, 2011. Effects of some organic materials on plant growth, flowering qualities and nutrient contents of Tagates erecta F1 Antigua Orange. Ege üniv. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi Özel sayı. 48(3):671-675.
  • Jackson M., 1958. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall, Inc. New Jersey, USA.
  • Kacar B, İnal A, 2008. Bitki Analizleri, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, ISBN 978-605-395- 036-3,Ankara
  • Kacar B, Katkat V, 2009. Bitki Besleme. Nobel yayınları, Ankara, 659 s
  • Kacar B, 2012. Toprak Analizleri. ISBN 6053951841,466
  • Kauser A.M., F. Azam, 1985. Effect of Humıc Acıd on Wheat (Trıtıcum Aestıvum L.). Environmentaland Experimental Botany. 25(3); 245-252,
  • Khan, R.U., A., Rashid, M.S., Khan, E., Ozturk. 2010. Impact of Humıc Acıd and Chemıcal Fertılızer Applıcatıon on Growth and Graın Yıeld of Raınfed Wheat (Trıtıcum Aestıvum L.). Pakistan J. Agric. Res. 23; 3-4
  • Lado LR, Hengl T, Reuter HI. 2008. Heavy metals in European soils: Ageostatistical analysis of the FOREGS Geochemical database. Geoderma, 148; 189 199
  • Lindsay WL and Norvell WA., 1978. Development of a DTPA Soil Test For Zinc, İron, Manganese and Copper. Soil Science Society of American Proceeding 42: 421-428.
  • Mackowiak, C.L., P.R. Grossl, B.G. Bugbee. 2001. Beneficial Effects of Humic Acid on Micronutrient Availability to Wheat. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65:1744–1750
  • Marschner H, 1995.Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Special Publications of the Society for General Microbiology Gulf Professional Publishing, ISBN 0124735436, 9780124735439
  • Olsen SR., Cole V., Watanabe FS and Dean LA., 1954. Estimations of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extractions with Sodium Bicarbonate. U.S. Deptartment of Agriculture. Cric. 939- 941
  • Piccolo, A., Celano, G., Pietramellara, G., 1993. Effects of fractions of coal-derived humic substances on seed germination and growth of seedlings (Lactuga sativa and Lycopersicum esculentum). Biol. Fertil. Soils. 16, 11–15.
  • Richards LA., 1954. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkaline Soils. Handbook 60. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
  • Shoushan, A.M.; El-Bogoury, H.M.; Fahmy, G.E.; Dahab, A.M.A.; El-Dabh, R.S. an E1-Khateeb, M.A. 1980. Effect of planting date and chemical fertilization on corm development in gladiolus. Research Bulletin, Faculty of Agriculture, Shams University. 1342-15.
  • Stevenson, F.J. 1982. Humus chemistry: Genesis, composition, reactions. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
  • Sönmez F, Çığ A, Gülser F, Başdoğan G, 2013.The effects of some organic fertilizers on nutrient contents in hybrid Gladiolus. Eurasion Journal of Soil Science. 2(2);140-143.
  • Sönmez F, Alp Ş, Yaşar Ö, 2017. The Effects of Humic Acid Application on the Nutrient Contents And Heavy Metals in Organs of Marigold (Tagetes Erecta L.). Fresenius Environmental Bulletin. 26(8); 5340-5348
  • Thomas GW., 1982. Exchangeable Cations. P. 159- 165. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Agronomy Monography. No: 9, A.S.A.-S.S.S.A., Madison, Winconsin. USA.
  • Vaugha D, 1974. A possible mechanism for humic acid action on cell elongation in root segments of Pisum sativum under aseptic conditions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 6(4): 241-247
  • Walkey A., 1947. A Critical Examination of a Rapid Method for Determining Organic Carbon in Soils: Effect of Varations in Digestion Conditions and Inorganic Soil Constiuents. Soil Science, 63 251-263.
  • Wang, X.J., Wang, Z.Q., Li, S.G. 1995. The effect of humic acids on the availability of phosphorus fertilizers in alkaline soils. Soil Use and Management. 11: 99–102

Effects of Different Doses of Phosphorus and Humic Acids on Micro Nutrients Contents (Fe, Cu, Zn ve Mn) in Gladiolus Cultivars

Year 2018, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 319 - 325, 30.09.2018
https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.458669

Abstract

In this study it was aimed that effects of different doses of phosphorus and humic acid on micro nutrients contents of gladiolus cultivars. Rose Supreme, Deppest Red and Essential gladiolus cultivars were used in this experiment.Three different doses of phosphorus (P1:0, P2:100, P3:200 mg P kg-1) and humic acid (HA1:0, HA2:1000, HA3:2000 mg HA kg-1) were applied plastic pots having 3 kg plant growing media.The experiment was ended after 140 days following planted corm. Iron, Copper, Zinc and Manganese were analysed in the harvested plants.When taking into account micro nutrient contents significant differences were not found among cultivars except Cu contents.The differences of Cu contents caused by different cultivars were found significant at 5% level statistically.Effects of different phosphorus applications on Mn and Fe contents of gladiolus were determined significant at 1% level. Effects of cultivar x phosphorus interactions were found significant (1%) in Zn and Cu contents. Cultivar x phosphorus x humic acid interactions caused the significantly differences in Mn and Cu contents statistically.The highest Fe and Zn contents were obtained as 57.9 mg kg-1 and 82.0 mg kg-1 in HA3 applications. The highest Cu contents were found as 11.4 mg kg-1 in HA2 application.

References

  • Adani, F., P. Genevini, P. Zaccheo, G. Zocchi, 1998. The effect of commercial humic acid on tomato plant growth andmineral nutrition. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 21(3); 561-575.
  • Allison, L.E., Moodie, C.D., 1965. Carbonate. In: C.A. Black et al (ed.) Methods of Soil Analaysis, Part 2, Agronomy Series, Am. Soc. of Argon., Inc., U.S.A., 9:1379-1400.
  • Alpaslan M, Güneş A, İnal A, 2005. Deneme Tekniği. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayın no:1543, Ders kitabı:496
  • Altan T. ve Altan S., 1984. Glayöl ve Gerbera Yetiştiriciliği, T.A.V. Yayınları, Yay. No: 6.
  • Anonim, 2015. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (www.tuik.gov.tr).
  • Baldotto MA, Munız RC, Baldotto L EB, Dobbss LB, 2011. Root growth of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh treated with humic acids isolated from typical soils of Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil. Revista Ceres, 58(4): 504-511.
  • Baldotto MA, Baldotto LEB, 2014. Ácidos húmicos. Revista Ceres, 61:856-881.
  • Chen Y, Avaid T, 1990. Effect of humic substances on plant growth. American society of agronomy and soil science (eds): Humic substances in soil and crop science; selected readings. American Society of Agronom, Madison, WI, 161-186.
  • Gülser F, Çığ A, Sönmez F, 2011. Effects of some organic materials on plant growth, flowering qualities and nutrient contents of Tagates erecta F1 Antigua Orange. Ege üniv. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi Özel sayı. 48(3):671-675.
  • Jackson M., 1958. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall, Inc. New Jersey, USA.
  • Kacar B, İnal A, 2008. Bitki Analizleri, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, ISBN 978-605-395- 036-3,Ankara
  • Kacar B, Katkat V, 2009. Bitki Besleme. Nobel yayınları, Ankara, 659 s
  • Kacar B, 2012. Toprak Analizleri. ISBN 6053951841,466
  • Kauser A.M., F. Azam, 1985. Effect of Humıc Acıd on Wheat (Trıtıcum Aestıvum L.). Environmentaland Experimental Botany. 25(3); 245-252,
  • Khan, R.U., A., Rashid, M.S., Khan, E., Ozturk. 2010. Impact of Humıc Acıd and Chemıcal Fertılızer Applıcatıon on Growth and Graın Yıeld of Raınfed Wheat (Trıtıcum Aestıvum L.). Pakistan J. Agric. Res. 23; 3-4
  • Lado LR, Hengl T, Reuter HI. 2008. Heavy metals in European soils: Ageostatistical analysis of the FOREGS Geochemical database. Geoderma, 148; 189 199
  • Lindsay WL and Norvell WA., 1978. Development of a DTPA Soil Test For Zinc, İron, Manganese and Copper. Soil Science Society of American Proceeding 42: 421-428.
  • Mackowiak, C.L., P.R. Grossl, B.G. Bugbee. 2001. Beneficial Effects of Humic Acid on Micronutrient Availability to Wheat. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65:1744–1750
  • Marschner H, 1995.Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Special Publications of the Society for General Microbiology Gulf Professional Publishing, ISBN 0124735436, 9780124735439
  • Olsen SR., Cole V., Watanabe FS and Dean LA., 1954. Estimations of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extractions with Sodium Bicarbonate. U.S. Deptartment of Agriculture. Cric. 939- 941
  • Piccolo, A., Celano, G., Pietramellara, G., 1993. Effects of fractions of coal-derived humic substances on seed germination and growth of seedlings (Lactuga sativa and Lycopersicum esculentum). Biol. Fertil. Soils. 16, 11–15.
  • Richards LA., 1954. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkaline Soils. Handbook 60. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
  • Shoushan, A.M.; El-Bogoury, H.M.; Fahmy, G.E.; Dahab, A.M.A.; El-Dabh, R.S. an E1-Khateeb, M.A. 1980. Effect of planting date and chemical fertilization on corm development in gladiolus. Research Bulletin, Faculty of Agriculture, Shams University. 1342-15.
  • Stevenson, F.J. 1982. Humus chemistry: Genesis, composition, reactions. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
  • Sönmez F, Çığ A, Gülser F, Başdoğan G, 2013.The effects of some organic fertilizers on nutrient contents in hybrid Gladiolus. Eurasion Journal of Soil Science. 2(2);140-143.
  • Sönmez F, Alp Ş, Yaşar Ö, 2017. The Effects of Humic Acid Application on the Nutrient Contents And Heavy Metals in Organs of Marigold (Tagetes Erecta L.). Fresenius Environmental Bulletin. 26(8); 5340-5348
  • Thomas GW., 1982. Exchangeable Cations. P. 159- 165. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Agronomy Monography. No: 9, A.S.A.-S.S.S.A., Madison, Winconsin. USA.
  • Vaugha D, 1974. A possible mechanism for humic acid action on cell elongation in root segments of Pisum sativum under aseptic conditions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 6(4): 241-247
  • Walkey A., 1947. A Critical Examination of a Rapid Method for Determining Organic Carbon in Soils: Effect of Varations in Digestion Conditions and Inorganic Soil Constiuents. Soil Science, 63 251-263.
  • Wang, X.J., Wang, Z.Q., Li, S.G. 1995. The effect of humic acids on the availability of phosphorus fertilizers in alkaline soils. Soil Use and Management. 11: 99–102
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme / Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
Authors

Füsun Gülser 0000-0002-9495-8839

Nalan Türkoğlu This is me 0000-0003-2639-360X

Ferit Sönmez This is me 0000-0003-1437-4081

Mehmet Nuri Çavuşoğlu This is me 0000-0002-8986-9452

Publication Date September 30, 2018
Submission Date October 24, 2017
Acceptance Date April 16, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 8 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Gülser, F., Türkoğlu, N., Sönmez, F., Çavuşoğlu, M. N. (2018). Farklı Dozlarda Fosfor ve Humik Asit Uygulamalarının Glayöl Çeşitlerinde Mikro Besin Elementi (Fe, Cu, Zn ve Mn) İçeriklerine Etkisi. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 8(3), 319-325. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.458669
AMA Gülser F, Türkoğlu N, Sönmez F, Çavuşoğlu MN. Farklı Dozlarda Fosfor ve Humik Asit Uygulamalarının Glayöl Çeşitlerinde Mikro Besin Elementi (Fe, Cu, Zn ve Mn) İçeriklerine Etkisi. J. Inst. Sci. and Tech. September 2018;8(3):319-325. doi:10.21597/jist.458669
Chicago Gülser, Füsun, Nalan Türkoğlu, Ferit Sönmez, and Mehmet Nuri Çavuşoğlu. “Farklı Dozlarda Fosfor Ve Humik Asit Uygulamalarının Glayöl Çeşitlerinde Mikro Besin Elementi (Fe, Cu, Zn Ve Mn) İçeriklerine Etkisi”. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 8, no. 3 (September 2018): 319-25. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.458669.
EndNote Gülser F, Türkoğlu N, Sönmez F, Çavuşoğlu MN (September 1, 2018) Farklı Dozlarda Fosfor ve Humik Asit Uygulamalarının Glayöl Çeşitlerinde Mikro Besin Elementi (Fe, Cu, Zn ve Mn) İçeriklerine Etkisi. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 8 3 319–325.
IEEE F. Gülser, N. Türkoğlu, F. Sönmez, and M. N. Çavuşoğlu, “Farklı Dozlarda Fosfor ve Humik Asit Uygulamalarının Glayöl Çeşitlerinde Mikro Besin Elementi (Fe, Cu, Zn ve Mn) İçeriklerine Etkisi”, J. Inst. Sci. and Tech., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 319–325, 2018, doi: 10.21597/jist.458669.
ISNAD Gülser, Füsun et al. “Farklı Dozlarda Fosfor Ve Humik Asit Uygulamalarının Glayöl Çeşitlerinde Mikro Besin Elementi (Fe, Cu, Zn Ve Mn) İçeriklerine Etkisi”. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 8/3 (September 2018), 319-325. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.458669.
JAMA Gülser F, Türkoğlu N, Sönmez F, Çavuşoğlu MN. Farklı Dozlarda Fosfor ve Humik Asit Uygulamalarının Glayöl Çeşitlerinde Mikro Besin Elementi (Fe, Cu, Zn ve Mn) İçeriklerine Etkisi. J. Inst. Sci. and Tech. 2018;8:319–325.
MLA Gülser, Füsun et al. “Farklı Dozlarda Fosfor Ve Humik Asit Uygulamalarının Glayöl Çeşitlerinde Mikro Besin Elementi (Fe, Cu, Zn Ve Mn) İçeriklerine Etkisi”. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, vol. 8, no. 3, 2018, pp. 319-25, doi:10.21597/jist.458669.
Vancouver Gülser F, Türkoğlu N, Sönmez F, Çavuşoğlu MN. Farklı Dozlarda Fosfor ve Humik Asit Uygulamalarının Glayöl Çeşitlerinde Mikro Besin Elementi (Fe, Cu, Zn ve Mn) İçeriklerine Etkisi. J. Inst. Sci. and Tech. 2018;8(3):319-25.