Review
BibTex RIS Cite

Hayvan Hastalıkları Yönetiminde Yeni Bir Yaklaşım: Değer Zinciri Analizi

Year 2015, Volume: 12 Issue: 1, 43 - 47, 01.04.2015

Abstract

Bu derlemenin konusu, hayvan hastalıklarının risk yönetiminde değer zinciri yaklaşımının uygulanabilirliğini oluşturmaktadır.

Salgın hastalık mihrak sayılarının yüksekliği (örneğin, Şap, Anthrax, Brucellosis vs.) bu hastalıkların koruma

ve kontrolünde yeni yaklaşımları zorunlu kılmaktadır. Analizde hayvansal üretim zincirleri incelenmektedir. Yöntem

detaylı veri gerektirmektedir. Bu veriler nedir? Nasıl analiz edilir? Sisteme nasıl uygulanır? çalışmada bu gibi soruların

yanıtları aranmaktadır. Sonuç olarak salgın hastalıkların yönetiminde değer zinciri analiz yönteminin biran önce tartışmaya

açılması, uygulamaya aktarılması ve salgın hastalıkların sistem yaklaşımı içerisinde çözümlenmesi gerektiği

düşünülmektedir.

References

  • Akinwumi J, Okike I, Rich KM. Analyses of the poultry value chain and its linkages and interactions with HPAI risk factors in Nigeria, IFRPI, 2010, Africa/Indonesia Team Working Paper 34
  • 2. Boklund A, Halasa T, Cristiansen CL, Enøe C. Comparing control strategies against foot-and-mouth disease: Will vaccination be cost-effective in Denmark? Preventive Veterinaray Medicine 2013; 111(3-4), 206-219.
  • 3. Bracke MBM, De Greef KH, Hopster H. Qualitative Stakeholder Analysis for the Development of Sustainable Monitoring Systems for Farm Animal Welfare, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2005;18: 27–56.
  • 4. Byarugaba DK, Matovu F. Uganda poultry trade flows and value chain analysis, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FAO ECTAD Nairobi, 2011.
  • 5. Can MF, Yalçın C. Obtaining required data via Delphi Expert Opinion Surveys and target groups surveys for calculation of financial losses resulted from Brucellosis and cost-benefit analysis of alternative Brucellosis control strategies in Turkey. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 2011; 17 (4): 601-608.
  • 6. Domenech J, Lubroth J Eddi C, Martin V, and Roger F. Regional and international approaches on prevention and control of animal transboundary and emerging diseases. Ann N Y Acad Science 2006; 1081: 90–107.
  • 7. FAO. A value chain approach to animal diseases risk management- Technical foundations and paratical framework for field application. Animal Production and Health Guidelines. 2011; No. 4. Rome.
  • 8. Kaplinsky R. Globalisation and unequalisation: What can be learned from value chain analysis?, Journal of Development Studies, 2000; 37(2): 117-46.
  • 9. Kaplinsky R, Morris, M. ‘A handbook for value chain research’, Institute of development studies, University of Sussex and school of development studies, University of Natal. 2001.
  • 10. Kaplinsk R. “Spreading the gains form globalization: What can be learned form value chain analysis”, Problems of Economic Transition 2004; 47 (2): 74-115.
  • 11. OIE. Handbook on import risk analysis for animals and animal products Vol.1, Intorduction and qualitative risk analysis. Paris, World Organization for Animal Health 2004.
  • 12. Rich KM, Baker D, Randolph TF, Perry BD. Value chain analysis and animal health economics: opportunities and caveats. 2010, http://www.rvc.ac.uk/Meetings/AHE/documents/833_Baker_Rich. pdf ( erişim: 11.06.2014)
  • 13. Rushton J. The economics of animal health and production. MA, CABI International. Cambridge, 2009.
  • 14. Rushton J. A value chain approach to animal disease risk management (July 1, 2011). Food and Agriculture Organisation Animal Production and Health Series 2011; No. 4.
  • 15. Sakarya E. Salgın hayvan hastalıklarının sebep olduğu ekonomik kayıplar. Ankara Ticaret Borsası Dergisi 1991; 27-32.
  • 16. Sarıozkan S, Yalcın C, Cevger Y, Aral Y, Sipahi C. The financial impacts of the avian influenza outbreaks on Turkish table egg producers. World’s Poultry Sci J, 2009; 65, 91-6, DOI: 10.1017/S0043933909000007.
  • 17. Sipahi C, Yalcın C, Cevger Y, Aral Y, Genc L. Small-scale family poultry, production impact of avian influenza outbreaks on Turkish village chicken producers, and their opinions on the disease and disease control. World’s Poultry Science Journal 2011; 67, 131-136, DOI: 10.1017/S0043933911000110.
  • 18. Şentürk B. Güler H. Financial Effects of HPAI H5N1 Cases on Backyard Poultry in the Kızılırmak Delta, Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakülyesi Dergisi 2014; 20 (1): 73-8.
  • 19. Şentürk. B, Yalçın. C. Production Losses due to Endemic foot-and-mouth disease in cattle in Turkey, Turkish Journal of Veterinary Animal Science 2008; 32(6): 433-40.
  • 20. Taylor N, Pinto J, Rushton J. Linking value chain analysis with epidemiological risk assessment in order to identfy efficent disease control interventions-focusing on poultry value chains and H5N1 HPAI. A working paper relased December 2008 and revised January 2010. FAO AGAL, Rome.
  • Yalçın C, Sipahi C, Aral Y, Cevger Y. Economic effect of the highly pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 outbreaks among Turkey producers, 2005-06, Turkey. Avian Disease 2010; 54: 390-3.

A New Perspective on Animal Disease Management: Value Chain Analysis

Year 2015, Volume: 12 Issue: 1, 43 - 47, 01.04.2015

Abstract

The subject of this is value chain approach to risk management of animal diseases. Due to the high number

of outbreaks occurred worldwide (such as; Foot and Mouth disease, Antrax, Brucellosis etc.), protection and control of

these diseases requires new approaches. Analysis is based on an examination of the animal production chain. There

are detailed data requirments in methodology. What is these data? How can we analyze these data? How can they be

applied in systems? Answers to these questions are sought in the study. As a result of this study, epidemics

management via value chain analysis will be discussed soon, transferred to the application and, so, epidemic

diseases should be solved.

References

  • Akinwumi J, Okike I, Rich KM. Analyses of the poultry value chain and its linkages and interactions with HPAI risk factors in Nigeria, IFRPI, 2010, Africa/Indonesia Team Working Paper 34
  • 2. Boklund A, Halasa T, Cristiansen CL, Enøe C. Comparing control strategies against foot-and-mouth disease: Will vaccination be cost-effective in Denmark? Preventive Veterinaray Medicine 2013; 111(3-4), 206-219.
  • 3. Bracke MBM, De Greef KH, Hopster H. Qualitative Stakeholder Analysis for the Development of Sustainable Monitoring Systems for Farm Animal Welfare, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2005;18: 27–56.
  • 4. Byarugaba DK, Matovu F. Uganda poultry trade flows and value chain analysis, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FAO ECTAD Nairobi, 2011.
  • 5. Can MF, Yalçın C. Obtaining required data via Delphi Expert Opinion Surveys and target groups surveys for calculation of financial losses resulted from Brucellosis and cost-benefit analysis of alternative Brucellosis control strategies in Turkey. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 2011; 17 (4): 601-608.
  • 6. Domenech J, Lubroth J Eddi C, Martin V, and Roger F. Regional and international approaches on prevention and control of animal transboundary and emerging diseases. Ann N Y Acad Science 2006; 1081: 90–107.
  • 7. FAO. A value chain approach to animal diseases risk management- Technical foundations and paratical framework for field application. Animal Production and Health Guidelines. 2011; No. 4. Rome.
  • 8. Kaplinsky R. Globalisation and unequalisation: What can be learned from value chain analysis?, Journal of Development Studies, 2000; 37(2): 117-46.
  • 9. Kaplinsky R, Morris, M. ‘A handbook for value chain research’, Institute of development studies, University of Sussex and school of development studies, University of Natal. 2001.
  • 10. Kaplinsk R. “Spreading the gains form globalization: What can be learned form value chain analysis”, Problems of Economic Transition 2004; 47 (2): 74-115.
  • 11. OIE. Handbook on import risk analysis for animals and animal products Vol.1, Intorduction and qualitative risk analysis. Paris, World Organization for Animal Health 2004.
  • 12. Rich KM, Baker D, Randolph TF, Perry BD. Value chain analysis and animal health economics: opportunities and caveats. 2010, http://www.rvc.ac.uk/Meetings/AHE/documents/833_Baker_Rich. pdf ( erişim: 11.06.2014)
  • 13. Rushton J. The economics of animal health and production. MA, CABI International. Cambridge, 2009.
  • 14. Rushton J. A value chain approach to animal disease risk management (July 1, 2011). Food and Agriculture Organisation Animal Production and Health Series 2011; No. 4.
  • 15. Sakarya E. Salgın hayvan hastalıklarının sebep olduğu ekonomik kayıplar. Ankara Ticaret Borsası Dergisi 1991; 27-32.
  • 16. Sarıozkan S, Yalcın C, Cevger Y, Aral Y, Sipahi C. The financial impacts of the avian influenza outbreaks on Turkish table egg producers. World’s Poultry Sci J, 2009; 65, 91-6, DOI: 10.1017/S0043933909000007.
  • 17. Sipahi C, Yalcın C, Cevger Y, Aral Y, Genc L. Small-scale family poultry, production impact of avian influenza outbreaks on Turkish village chicken producers, and their opinions on the disease and disease control. World’s Poultry Science Journal 2011; 67, 131-136, DOI: 10.1017/S0043933911000110.
  • 18. Şentürk B. Güler H. Financial Effects of HPAI H5N1 Cases on Backyard Poultry in the Kızılırmak Delta, Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakülyesi Dergisi 2014; 20 (1): 73-8.
  • 19. Şentürk. B, Yalçın. C. Production Losses due to Endemic foot-and-mouth disease in cattle in Turkey, Turkish Journal of Veterinary Animal Science 2008; 32(6): 433-40.
  • 20. Taylor N, Pinto J, Rushton J. Linking value chain analysis with epidemiological risk assessment in order to identfy efficent disease control interventions-focusing on poultry value chains and H5N1 HPAI. A working paper relased December 2008 and revised January 2010. FAO AGAL, Rome.
  • Yalçın C, Sipahi C, Aral Y, Cevger Y. Economic effect of the highly pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 outbreaks among Turkey producers, 2005-06, Turkey. Avian Disease 2010; 54: 390-3.
There are 21 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Berrin Şentürk

Publication Date April 1, 2015
Submission Date January 15, 2017
Acceptance Date March 1, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015 Volume: 12 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Şentürk, B. (2015). Hayvan Hastalıkları Yönetiminde Yeni Bir Yaklaşım: Değer Zinciri Analizi. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(1), 43-47.
AMA Şentürk B. Hayvan Hastalıkları Yönetiminde Yeni Bir Yaklaşım: Değer Zinciri Analizi. Erciyes Üniv Vet Fak Derg. April 2015;12(1):43-47.
Chicago Şentürk, Berrin. “Hayvan Hastalıkları Yönetiminde Yeni Bir Yaklaşım: Değer Zinciri Analizi”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 12, no. 1 (April 2015): 43-47.
EndNote Şentürk B (April 1, 2015) Hayvan Hastalıkları Yönetiminde Yeni Bir Yaklaşım: Değer Zinciri Analizi. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 12 1 43–47.
IEEE B. Şentürk, “Hayvan Hastalıkları Yönetiminde Yeni Bir Yaklaşım: Değer Zinciri Analizi”, Erciyes Üniv Vet Fak Derg, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 43–47, 2015.
ISNAD Şentürk, Berrin. “Hayvan Hastalıkları Yönetiminde Yeni Bir Yaklaşım: Değer Zinciri Analizi”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 12/1 (April 2015), 43-47.
JAMA Şentürk B. Hayvan Hastalıkları Yönetiminde Yeni Bir Yaklaşım: Değer Zinciri Analizi. Erciyes Üniv Vet Fak Derg. 2015;12:43–47.
MLA Şentürk, Berrin. “Hayvan Hastalıkları Yönetiminde Yeni Bir Yaklaşım: Değer Zinciri Analizi”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 12, no. 1, 2015, pp. 43-47.
Vancouver Şentürk B. Hayvan Hastalıkları Yönetiminde Yeni Bir Yaklaşım: Değer Zinciri Analizi. Erciyes Üniv Vet Fak Derg. 2015;12(1):43-7.