Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Panoramik Radyografi ve Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Dental Tomografiye Uyarlanmış Periapikal İndeks ile Periapikal Lezyonların Karşılaştırılarak Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2018, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 50 - 55, 15.03.2018

Abstract

Amaç: Panoramik Radyografiye Uyarlanmış Periapikal İndeks (PAI) ve ortaya
konan yeni skorlama sistemi “konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı dental tomografiye
uyarlanmış periapikal indeks (CBCT-PAI)” ile periapikal lezyonların retrospektif
olarak karşılaştırılarak değerlendirilmesi çalışmanın temel amacıdır.
Yöntemler: Çalışma grubunu 100 kadın 100 erkek olmak üzere 200 hastanın panoramik
radyografi ve konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi (CBCT) görüntü kayıtları
oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmada panoramik radyografide periapikal lezyonlar “Periapikal
İndeks Skorlama Sistemi (PAI)” olarak adlandırılan ve radyogramlar üzerinde apikal
lezyonları, artan radyografik görüntü derecesine göre 1’den 5’e kadar bir skala kullanarak
değerlendiren bir sistem ile değerlendirilmiştir. CBCT’de görüntüleri ise PAI
skorlamasına kortikal kemik ekspansiyonu ve dekstrüksiyon parametreleri ilave edilerek
modifiye edilen CBCT-PAI skorlaması ile değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışmada skorlar
arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesinde Spearman’s rho korelasyon analizi kullanılmıştır.
Bulgular: Çalışmamızda cinsiyetlere göre yaş ortalamaları arasında istatistiksel olarak
anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmamaktadır (p>0,05). Cinsiyetlere göre lezyonlu diş sayıları
arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık saptanmamıştır (p>0,05). Tüm olgularda
PAI skorlaması ile koronal, sagital ve aksiyal düzlemlerdeki CBCT-PAI skorlaması arasında
aynı yönlü ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmaktadır (p=0,001; p<0,01).
Sonuç: Çalışmamızda CBCT ile periapikal lezyonların değerlendirilmesinde
daha güvenilir sonuçlar elde edildiği saptanmıştır.

References

  • Gröndahl HG, Huumonen S. Radiographic manifestations of periapical inflammatory lesions. Endod Topics 2004; 8: 55-67.

Comparative Evaluation of Periapical Lesions Using Periapical Index Adapted for Panoramic Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Year 2018, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 50 - 55, 15.03.2018

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to comparatively evaluate

periapical lesions using the periapical index adapted for panoramic

radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-PAI).

Methods: The study group consisted of pre-existing panoramic radiographs

and CBCT records of 200 individuals (100 women and 100 men).

In this study, panoramic radiographs were evaluated using the PAI scoring

system, which uses a scale from 1 to 5 with an increasing radiographic

periapical status degree. CBCT images were evaluated using the CBCT-PAI

scoring system, which includes two additional variables that indicate any

possible expansion or destruction of the cortical bone. During statistical

evaluation, the relationship between PAI and CBCT-PAI was investigated by

Spearman’s rho correlation analysis.

Results: In our study, there was no significant difference between the

mean ages according to gender (p>0.05). Moreover, there was no significant

difference between the numbers of teeth with lesions according to

gender (p>0.05). A significant and positive correlation was found between

PAI and CBCT- PAI scores in all samples in coronal, sagittal, and axial planes

(p<0.01).

Conclusion: It was confirmed that CBCT provides more accurate information

about the extension and dimensions of periapical lesions.

References

  • Gröndahl HG, Huumonen S. Radiographic manifestations of periapical inflammatory lesions. Endod Topics 2004; 8: 55-67.
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Gaye Keser

Filiz Namdar Pekiner This is me

Publication Date March 15, 2018
Submission Date January 10, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 8 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Keser, G., & Namdar Pekiner, F. (2018). Comparative Evaluation of Periapical Lesions Using Periapical Index Adapted for Panoramic Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, 8(1), 50-55.
AMA Keser G, Namdar Pekiner F. Comparative Evaluation of Periapical Lesions Using Periapical Index Adapted for Panoramic Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. March 2018;8(1):50-55.
Chicago Keser, Gaye, and Filiz Namdar Pekiner. “Comparative Evaluation of Periapical Lesions Using Periapical Index Adapted for Panoramic Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography”. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 8, no. 1 (March 2018): 50-55.
EndNote Keser G, Namdar Pekiner F (March 1, 2018) Comparative Evaluation of Periapical Lesions Using Periapical Index Adapted for Panoramic Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 8 1 50–55.
IEEE G. Keser and F. Namdar Pekiner, “Comparative Evaluation of Periapical Lesions Using Periapical Index Adapted for Panoramic Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography”, Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 50–55, 2018.
ISNAD Keser, Gaye - Namdar Pekiner, Filiz. “Comparative Evaluation of Periapical Lesions Using Periapical Index Adapted for Panoramic Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography”. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 8/1 (March 2018), 50-55.
JAMA Keser G, Namdar Pekiner F. Comparative Evaluation of Periapical Lesions Using Periapical Index Adapted for Panoramic Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2018;8:50–55.
MLA Keser, Gaye and Filiz Namdar Pekiner. “Comparative Evaluation of Periapical Lesions Using Periapical Index Adapted for Panoramic Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography”. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1, 2018, pp. 50-55.
Vancouver Keser G, Namdar Pekiner F. Comparative Evaluation of Periapical Lesions Using Periapical Index Adapted for Panoramic Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2018;8(1):50-5.

14639   14640